` CWP-27472-2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 115 CWP-27472-2025 Date of Decision: 15.09.2025 Anil …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: - Mr. Aditya Yadav, Advocate, Ms. Hemlata, Advocate and Mr. Viransh, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Ashok Kumar Khubbar, Additional Advocate General, Haryana *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to the respondents to consider him for appointment. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that instant petition may be disposed of in terms of order dated 14.01.2025 passed in CWP No.29643 of 2024, Rajesh Kumar and others v. State of Haryana and others. 3. The petitioner joined respondent as part time employee in 2013 and was made full time in 2016. He was released in 2021. He claims that similarly situated employees have been re-engaged. 4. Mr. Ashok Kumar Khubbar, Additional Advocate General, Haryana, who on advance notice is present in Court on behalf of respondent- State, submits that petitioner remained silent for four years and at this stage cannot be considered. MOHIT KUMAR 2025.09.15 16:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. ` CWP-27472-2025 -2- 5. On the asking of Court, learned State counsel submits that petitioner has not approached the Authorities and if he approaches the Authorities, his claim would be considered in accordance with law and as per applicable policy. 6. In the wake of statement of learned State counsel, the present petition stands disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 15.09.2025 Mohit Kumar Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No MOHIT KUMAR 2025.09.15 16:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.