NURAL HOQUE MOLLAH @ NURUL HOQUE v. THE UNION OF INDA AND ORS
I.A.(Civil)/919/2025 · 2025-03-27
Kalyan Rai Surana, Malasri Nandi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10099 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10099 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010068012025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/919/2025 NURAL HOQUE MOLLAH @ NURUL HOQUE S/O. LT. OSMAN GONI MOLLAH, VILL- SEDAMARI SANKARGHOLA, P/S - JOGIGHOPA, DIST- BONGAIGAON, ASSAM, PIN-783388. VERSUS THE UNION OF INDA AND ORS REP. BY THE MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NEW DELHI, PIN-110001.
2:THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM HOME DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006.
3:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER BONGAIGAON DIST. BONGAIGAON ASSAM PIN-788001.
4:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (B) BONGAIGAON ASSAM PIN-788001.
5:THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA NEW DELHI-110001.
6:THE STATE CO-ORDINATOR NATIONAL REGISTER OF CITIZENSHIP (NRC) BHANGAGARH
Page No.# 2/3 PIN-781032 Advocate for the Petitioner : P. GHOSH, MR. A M AHMED Advocate for the Respondent : SC, ECI, SC, NRC,SC, F.T,DY.S.G.I.,GA, ASSAM
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MALASRI NANDI
ORDER Date : 28.03.2025 (K.R. Surana, J)
Heard Mr. A.M. Ahmed, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. K. Gogoi, learned CGC; Mr. G. Sarma, learned standing counsel for the FT matters and NRC; Mr. M. Islam, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. A.I. Ali, learned standing counsel for the ECI; and Mr. P. Sarmah, learned Addl. Senior Govt. advocate.
2. This interlocutory application has been filed for correction of typographical error which has crept in the order dated 07.03.2025 passed by this Court in I.A.(C) 239/2025.
3. It is submitted that Respondent No. 4 is the Superintendent of Police (B), Bongaigaon. However, due to an inadvertent error, in paragraph 5 (d), the said authority has been incorrectly referred to as the Superintendent of Police (B), Barpeta.
4. As the prayer was not objected to, it is allowed. Hence, reference to Superintendent of Police (B), Barpeta appearing in paragraph 5 (d) of the said
order dated 07.03.2025 shall now be read as Superintendent of Police (B), Bongaigaon.
Page No.# 3/3
5. This order shall be read together with order dated 07.03.2025 passed by this Court in I.A.(C) 239/2025.
6. In the event the family members of the applicant appears before the Superintendent of Police (B), Bongaigaon, the said authority shall do the needful in terms of order dated 07.03.2025 passed by this Court in I.A.(C) 239/2025.
7. This interlocutory application stands disposed of.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant