2025:HHC:17862 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.4482 of 2025 Decided on: 05.06.2025 V.B. Hydro Project Ltd. … Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ____________________________________________________ _ For the petitioner : Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Ashok Kumar Verma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Sumit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 6- State. M/s Gurmeet Bhardwaj and Raj Thakur, Advocates, for respondents No. 7 to 10 and 12, 13. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) When this case was taken up for consideration, learned counsel appearing for the private respondents stated that no obstruction as is being alleged by the petitioner is being created by the private respondents and agitation by them is peaceful and they are not stopping ingress or egress of the workers of the Hydro Project Limited. 2. Taking into consideration the submissions so made by learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner, these proceedings are closed, but with liberty that in future, in case situation arises wherein someone creates obstruction in the functioning of the 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:17862 petitioner-Company, then the petitioner may approach the appropriate Forum for the redressal of its grievance. 3. The petition stands disposed of. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge June 05, 2025 (Rishi)