Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10095 (GAU)

NARJIMA BEGUM @ NARJUMA BEGUM v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

AB/769/2025 · 2025-05-22

Mridul Kumar Kalita

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010068122025 2025:GAU-AS:6586 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/769/2025 NARJIMA BEGUM @ NARJUMA BEGUM W/O- ISMAIL ALI, R/O- UDIANA, PS RANGIA, KAMRUP, ASSAM, PIN- 781354 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. S KAUR, L BANIK,MR. R R BAISHYA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA ORDER 23.05.2025 1. Heard Ms. L. Banik, the learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. S.H. Bora, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State of Assam. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner was granted interim bail by this Court, by order dated Page No.# 2/2 22.04.2025, and in pursuant to the directions of this Court, the petitioner has appeared before the Investigating Officer and has co-operated in the investigation. 3. On the other hand, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor Ms. S.H. Bora, has produced the Case Diary of Rangia P.S. Case No. 40/2025 and has submitted that the petitioner has appeared before the Investigating Officer and his statement under Section 181 of the BNSS, 2023 has also been recorded. 4. Considering the fact that the petitioner has complied with the directions of this Court and has co-operated in the investigation, the interim bail granted to him, by order dated 22.04.2025 by this Court is hereby made absolute with a condition that the petitioner shall continue to co-operate in the investigation. 5. With the above observations, this anticipatory bail application is accordingly disposed of. 6. Send back the Case Diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant