Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10092 (HP)

PANKAJ KUMAR v. RAKESH KANWAR AND ANR

COPC/756/2025 · 2025-07-25

Sandeep Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 756 of 2025 Date of Decision: 25.07.2025 _____________________________________________________________________ Pankaj Kumar ……...Petitioner Versus Rakesh Kanwar & Anr. …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner: Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar & Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) Before notices, if any, in the instant proceedings could be issued to the respondents for their alleged willful disobedience, Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General, while putting in appearance on behalf of the respondents, has placed on record communication dated 28.03.2025, issued under the signatures of Director, Elementary Education, Himachal Pradesh, perusal whereof reveals that respondents, after having considered the representation in light of mandate contained in the judgment, alleged to have been violated, have transferred the petitioner, who is working as JBT under 5% inter district quota from GPS Sheelghat, EB Dhundhan, District Solan to GPS Dari, EB Dharamshala, District Kangra, Himachal Pradesh. 2 2. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and accordingly, the same are disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. Notice issued to the respondents are discharged. July 25, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (Sunil) Judge