Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:118569 Court No. - 72 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 32902 of 2024 Applicant :- Nand Kishor And 4 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ram Jatan Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- Devendra Singh,G.A. Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants; counsel for the opposite party no.2; learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the charge sheet dated 12.12.2020 and cognizance order dated 10.2.2021, as well as further proceeding of Case No. 1942 of 2021, arising out of case crime no. 312 of 2020, under sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 325, 308, 504, 506 I.P.C, Police Station Fatehabad, District Agra, pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court no. 3, Agra. 3. Counsel for the applicants submits that both the parties lodged F.I.R. against each other and received injuries. The F.I.R., lodged by the applicants against the opposite party no. 2, has been quashed by this Court vide order dated 06.05.2025 passed in Application under Section 482 No.33326 of 2024. It is next submitted that in this case, the applicants and opposite party no. 2 have amicably settled the dispute out of the court. Counsel for the applicant submits that applicants filed 482 Application before this Court to quash the proceedings and the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 27.09.2024 directed the parties to appear before the court below for verification of compromise. 4. Pursuant to the said order, the parties appeared before the court below and in their presence, after due verification of the contents of the compromise made between the parties, the court vide order dated 17.10.2024 has passed the verification report. A copy of the same is annexed with the supplementary affidavit. 5. Learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that the applicant and opposite party no.2 have settled their private and civil dispute through compromise and as such opposite party no.2 does not wish to press the aforesaid case against the applicant. Opposite party no.2 is ready to withdraw the prosecution of the applicants and in view of the compromise, no fruitful purpose would be served if the prosecution is allowed to go on. 6. Learned counsel appearing for the opposite party no.2 does not dispute the correctness of the submission made by learned counsel for the applicants or the correctness of the documents relied upon by him. He submits that opposite party no. 2 has no objection, if the proceedings in the aforesaid case are quashed. 7. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the applicants and opposite party no. 2 do not want to pursue the case any further as stated by them. The matter has been mutually settled between the parties, therefore, no useful purpose would be served in proceeding with the matter further. 8. Thus in view of the well settled principle of law as laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the matters of Krishnappa & Ors. vs. State of Karnataka; 2021 0 Supreme(SC) 529, Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and Ors. vs. State of Gujarat and another; 2017 9 SCC 641, B.S. Joshi Vs. State of Haryana; 2003(4) SCC 675, Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Burea of Investigation and another; (2008) 9 Supreme Court Cases 677, Gian Singh Vs. Stated of Punjab; (2012) 10 SCC 303 and Narinder Singh & others Vs. State of Punjab and another; (2014) Supreme Today 642, the proceedings of Case No. 1942 of 2021, arising out of case crime no. 312 of 2020, under sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 325, 308, 504, 506 1.P.C, Police Station Fatehabad, District Agra, is hereby quashed. 9. The application under Section 482 CrPC is accordingly allowed. Order Date :- 21.7.2025 Meenu Singh Digitally signed by :- MEENU SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad