Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10091 (PAT)

Subodh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./3062/2025 · 2025-05-02

Smt Soni Shrivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3062 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-129 Year-2024 Thana- ROSHANGANJ District- Gaya ====================================================== Subodh Kumar Son of Suresh Singh Resident of Village- Kanchan Nagar, Kanap, P.S.- Haspura, District-Aurangabad (Bihar) ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Md. Javed Jafar Khan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs.Sucheta Yadav, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 3 02-05-2025 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Roshanganj P.S. Case no.129 of 2024 registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018. 3. As per the prosecution case, 6 liters of foreign liquor was recovered from a Hero Honda motorcycle bearing Registration No. BR26W7299. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R and cause of his false implication is only for the reason that he happens to be the registered owner of the seized motorcycle. No recovery has been made from the conscious Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3062 of 2025(3) dt.02-05-2025 2/2 possession of the petitioner. He further submits that his co- villager took his motorcycle for purchasing of medicine and the petitioner has no knowledge that co-villager used his motorcycle in liquor supply. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and undertakes to cooperate in the case/trial. 6. The application for anticipatory bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State. 7. In view of the facts of the case that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as also no recovery has been made from physical or conscious possession from him, it is directed that the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with Roshanganj P.S. Case no.129 of 2024 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special Excise Court No.5, Gaya, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure/Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S, 2023. harsh/- (Soni Shrivastava, J) U T