SATISH KUMAR RAI AND 65 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/14706/2025 · 2025-09-24
Manju Rani Chauhan
Civil Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 100904 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 100904 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14706 of 2025 Court No. - 52 HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the State, Sri Sanjay Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 2 & 3 and perused the record. The petitioners have preferred instant writ petition for a direction upon respondent authorities to grant them the benefit of continuity of service from the date of their joining pursuant to their absorption as Assistant Teacher in the year 2014 and 2015 till the their joining as Assistant Teacher pursuant to recruitment made by the State Government in 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019, for the purposes of seniority, including financial benefits i.e. protection and increment emanating therefrom. At the very outset, Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, learned counsel for respondent nos. 2 & 3 submits that the issue involved in the instant petition has already been decided by a full Bench of this Court in a bunch of petitions leading being Writ-A No. 34833 of 2014 (Anand Kumar Yadav & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors.) and the aforesaid order has been affirmed by the Hon'ble Apex Court vide order dated 25.07.2017 passed in Civil Appeal No. 9529 of 2017 (State of U.P. & Anr. etc Vs. Anand Kumar Yadav & Ors. etc). Thus, the petitioners are not entitled for the relief as being prayed for. However, in case petitioners moves fresh representations before the competent authority, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pankaj Kumar Ojha Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sanjay Kumar Singh Satish Kumar Rai And 65 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
with law. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case set up on behalf of the petitioners, the present writ petition is disposed of by providing that the petitioners may make fresh representations, individually, ventilating all their grievances, supported by such documents, as may be advised, before the respondent no.3 within three weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order.
On such representation being made, respondent no.3 shall make all endeavours to consider and decide the same, strictly in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order, after giving proper opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment. September 25, 2025 DS WRIA No. 14706 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- DIGAMBER SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad