DHARMENDRA SINGH AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NA528/37068/2025 · 2025-10-07
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 100903 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 100903 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 37068 of 2025 Court No. - 75 HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J. Sri Deepak Singh, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri A.K. Rai, learned A.G.A. for the State are present. The present application under Section 528 BNSS has been filed to quash the
order dated 11.07.2025 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Allahabad in Session Trial No. 2319 of 2024 in Case Crime No. 418 of 2017, under Sections 323, 504, 506, 308 of IPC, P.S. Jhunsi, District Prayagraj, whereby NBW has been issued against the applicants.
Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants were on bail at the time of issuing non-bailable warrant. It is further submitted that the impugned order has been passed without satisfying itself that the summon and other process for attendance has been served. It is further submitted that the impugned order has been passed without considering the position of law. It is settled position of law that N.B.W. should be issued as a last resort after the litigant fails to respond the notices/summons and bailable warrant. It is further submitted that non-bailable warrant has been issued without issuing any summon and bailable warrant. Learned A.G.A. as well as learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 have opposed the application. Considering submissions of learned counsel for the applicants and perusing record, the instant application is finally disposed of with a direction that in case applicants appear before the court below within three weeks from today Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Deepak Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Dharmendra Singh And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
and applies for bail/recall of non bailable warrant, his application shall be decided in the light of the observations made in the judgments rendered by the Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Another, (2021) 10 SCC 773, Siddharth Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Another 2022 (11) SCC 676 and Aman Preet Singh Vs. C.B.I. through Director 2021 SCC Online SC 941. For a period of three weeks from today or till applicants appear before the court below, whichever is earlier, execution of non bailable warrant against applicants shall be kept in abeyance. ctober 8, 2025 MAA/- NA528 No. 37068 of 2025 2 (Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.)
Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD AZAD ANSARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad