Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10090 (AP)

Kunchala Madhava Rao, v. Kunchala Venkateswarlu,

CRP/380/2021 · 2025-07-10

T C D Sekhar

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010113412021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] FRIDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 380/2021 Between: 1. KUNCHALA MADHAVA RAO,, S/O. VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS, BEING MINOR STUDENT, BROTHER'S PROTECTION, REP.BY GUARDIAN I.E., BROTHER OF KUNCHALA BALAKRISHNA, S/O. VENKATESWARLU, VADDIPALEM, SANTHANUTHALAPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. KUNCHALA VENKATESWARLU, , S/O. VENKATESWARLU C/O. ANKAMMA MASTRI, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, HINDU, OPP. E-SEVA, BHAGYANAGAR NIRMAL NAGAR, NIRMAL MANDALAM, ADILABAD DISTRICT 2. BOORSU SUJATHA, W/O. VENKATESWARLU C/O. ANKAMMA MASTRI, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, HINDU, OPP. E-SEVA, BHAGYANAGAR NIRMAL NAGAR, NIRMAL MANDALAM, ADILABAD DISTRICT, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O. 3-194, SUBLAID VILLAGE, TIRUMALAYAPALEM MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT 3. KUNCHALA SAMBAIAH SAMBASIVUDU, S/O. PEDAMALLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, HINDU, NEAR OVERHEAD WATER TANK, VADDIPALEM, SANTHANUTHALAPADU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT 4. KUNCHALA BALA KRISHNA, S/O. VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, RESIDING IN VADDIPALEM, SANTHANUTHALAPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toAggrieved by the order, dated 11-12-2020 made in I.A.No.30612020111 O.S.No.227/2011, on the file of the Court of the Principal Junior Civil Jud Ongole, the present C.R.P. is filed. The petitioner craves the leave of this Hon'ble Court and begs to present the above' C.R.P. for the following among other grounds IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay all further proceedings in 0.S.No.227/2011, on the file of the Court of the Principal Junior Civil Judge: Ongole pending disposal of the above C.R.P. and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S A RAZAK Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following: ORDER: The present revision is filed against the order dated 11.12.2020 passed in I.A.No.306 of 2020 in O.S.No.227 of 2011 on the file of the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Ongole. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that, the cause in the revision petition does not survive. 3. The submission is placed on record. 4. In view of the same, nothing survives to be adjudicated in the instant revision and accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR 11th July, 2025 cbn 364 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.380 of 2021 11th July, 2025 cbn