Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10088 (UTT)

ANKIT SINGH AND ORS v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/902/2024 · 2025-03-21

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.902 of 2024 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Pankaj Singh Chauhan, learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. Mr. Vipul Painuly, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Learned State Counsel submits that after investigation challanee report was filed against petitioner no.1 (Ankit Singh) and petitioner no.2 (Anuj Singh @ Yogesh Singh) on 07.01.2025 as they were minors on the date of incident. He further submits that with respect to petitioner no.3 (Vijay Singh) and petitioner no.4 (Vipin Singh) charge-sheet has also been filed on 07.01.2025. 4. In view of the statement made by learned State Counsel, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 5. It is open to the petitioners to challenge the charge- sheet before the appropriate Forum. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 21.03.2025 AK