Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10088 (JHR)

BASUDEO PANDIT v. STATE OF JHARKHAND And ORS.

WPC/5304/2008 · 2025-07-04

Gautam Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:17932 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (C) No. 5304 of 2008 Basudeo Pandit, S/o Rewa Kumhar, R/o Village- Khurjio, P.S. Birni, District- Giridih. .... .. ... Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Additional Collector, Giridih. 3. Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Giridih. 4. Circle Officer, Birni, Giridih 5. Khirandra Das, S/o Akal Rabidas 6. Tulsi Das, S/o Prabhu Rabidas 7. Budhan Das, S/o Gujar Das 8. Mani Das, S/o Puran Das Srl. Nos.5 to 8 are R/o Village- Khurjio, PS- Birni, District- Giridih. 9. Sona Pandit 10. Sanichar Pandit 11. Bhagirath Pandit 12. Guru Pandit 13. Kokil Pandit 14. Budhu Pandit Sl. No.9 to 14 are sons of Rewa Kumhar. 15. Bhikan Pandit 16. Tinku Pandit (Minor) 17. Nago Pandit (Minor) Sl. Nos. 15 to 17 are sons of Khuso Pandit, Proforma Respondent Nos.16 & 17 represented through his brother, namely, Bhikan Pandit. 18. Rewa Kumhar, S/o Late Teko Kumhar 19. Mohan Pandit, S/o Late Nunu Kumhar Srl. Nos.9 to 19 are R/o Village- Khurjio, PS- Birni, District- Giridih. .. ... ...Respondent(s) ........... CORAM :HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY ......... For the Petitioner (s) : None For the State : Mr. Rahul Kamlesh, AC to SC.IV …... 07/ 04.07.2025. From perusal of the earlier order dated 04.02.2022, it appears that specific direction was given for service of notice upon Respondent Nos.5 to 8, but the same has still not been complied with. Accordingly, the instant Writ Petition stands dismissed for non- compliance. (Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sandeep/