HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 3043 of 2025 Court No. - 55 HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard Sri Ram Karan, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Mridul Kumar, learned standing counsel for the state-respondents and Sri Pankaj Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for the respondent-gaon sabha. 2. The instant Public Interest Litigation has been filed for the following relief:- "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding and directing the respondent no.3 to decide the recall application dated 22.8.2024 filed by respondent no.5 in Original Suit No.2797/2017, pending in the court of respondent no.3(Tehsildar), Tehsil, Mehdawala." 3. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that private respondent no.5 has filed a time-barred restoration application against the order passed under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, as such, appropriate direction be issued for the expeditious disposal of the pending restoration application. 4. On the other hand, learned standing counsel and the counsel for the respondent-gaon sabha submitted that application filed by the private respondent no.5 is pending wherein petitioner is not a party, as such, the instant P.I.L. for expeditious disposal of the pending restoration application, cannot be entertained. 5. I have considered the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Karan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Kumar Gupta Vinod Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) parties and perused the records. 6. There is no dispute about the fact that the restoration application filed by the private respondent no. 5 is time-barred. 7. No case for expeditious disposal at the instance of the petitioner is made out. 8. The P.I.L. is dismissed accordingly. October 9, 2025 C.Prakash WPIL No. 3043 of 2025 2 (Chandra Kumar Rai,J.) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad