Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010112472020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 6840/2020 Between:
1. MARISETTI SATISH, S/O.(LATE) SIVA RRASAD, HINDU, MALE, AGE-37 YEARS,
SAVITRUPETA, 15TH WARD, TADEPALLIGUDEM-W.G.DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRL SECRATARY (HOME DEPARTMENT), SECRATERIAT BUILDINGS, A.P. SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE SUPERINDENT OF POLICE, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ELURU.
3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, TADEPALLIGUDEM TOWN POLICE STATION, TADEPALLIGUDEM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to passed an order or orders, direction or directions, writ or writ of Mandamus and to declare the inaction of the respondents not considering the petitioner Complaint and taking any action against the Petitioner Complaints Consequently direct to the 3rd respondent by considering the petitioner complaint registered case and investigate the same. Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SOMA RAJU YELISETTI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME (AP)
2
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief:
“.... to passed an order or orders, direction or directions, writ or writ of Mandamus and to declare the inaction of the respondents not considering the petitioner Complaint and taking any action against the Petitioner Complaints Consequently direct to the 3rd respondent by considering the petitioner complaint registered case and investigate the same. ...”
None represented for the Petitioner.
Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, would submit that as per the complaint of the Petitioner, the offences are non- cognizable and hence, no case is registered and would submit that this Writ Petition may be disposed of by passing appropriate orders.
In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.
Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/*
3
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Writ Petition No. 6840 of 2020
12.09.2025
Mjl /*