HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33777 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, J. HON'BLE INDRAJEET SHUKLA, J. 1.Heard Sri Sudarshan Singh learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Shashi Dhar Sahai learned counsel for respondent-bank. 2. Challenge has been raised to the auction notice dated 18.08.2025 whereby the petitioner's dwelling house was proposed to be auctioned under the SARFAESI Act, 2002. 3. At the outset, Sri Shashi Dhar Sahai learned counsel for the respondent bank states that the property has already been auctioned on 25.09.2025. 4. In view of the fact that third party rights have already intervened and in face of statutory remedy available to the petitioner under SARFAESI Act, interference claimed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is declined. Writ petition is dismissed leaving it open to the petitioner to avail statutory remedy in accordance with law. October 8, 2025 Faraz Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Navin Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Anadi Krishna Narayana (Indrajeet Shukla,J.) (Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.) Mohd. Shahid And Another .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- FARAZ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- FARAZ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad