Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10085 (JHR)

MD ABID HUSSAIN ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/286/2024 · 2025-01-17

Rajesh Shankar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No.286 of 2024 With I.A. No.3971 of 2024 ----- 1. Md. Abid Hussain Ansari 2. Manoj Kumar Paswan 3. Janmejay Kumar Dubey 4. Meraj Alam 5. Baban Kumar 6. Md. Ilyas Ansari 7. Sanjeev Kumar 8. Prabhat Kumar Verma 9. Rabindra Kumar 10. Mahmood Alam 11. Bimlesh Kumar 12. Md. Salim Ansari 13. Sanjay Kumar 14. Rajesh Chandra Paul 15. Anil Kumar Singh 16. Md. Sharif 17. Sujit Kumar Mahto 18. Megh Nath Mandal 19. Sudhir Pandey 20. Ajay Kumar 21. Bishu Kumar 22. Pramod Kumar 23. Gopal Chandra Gorai 24. Chanchal Kumar Tiwary 25. Rakesh Kumar Lal 26. Kameshwar Rajak 27. Madan Kumar Sinha 28. Rajiv Kumar Singh 29. Sunil Kumar Ray 30. Ramswarup Prasad 31. Suresh Kumar Harizan 32. Ramswarup Prajapati 33. Binay Kumar 34. Chandra Kishore Sharma 35. Anil Kumar Singh 36. Swapan Kumar Mahto 37. Prabendra Paswan 38. Binod Das 39. Pravin Kumar 40. Rameshwar Das 41. Mohammad Shams Tabrez 42. Gaya Choudhary 43. Renu Kumari 44. Jay Prakash 45. Anand Prakash 46. Vasant Kumar Indraguru 47. Umesh Prasad Singh 48. Om Prakash Lal 49. Ajit Kumar 50. Abu Sayeed .......... Petitioners. -Versus- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Mr. Uma Shankar Singh, The Secretary, Department of School Education and Literacy, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, Dhurwa, Ranchi. .......... Opp. Parties. ----- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioners : Mr. Shahdeo Choudhary, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ajit Kumar, A.C. to G.A.V ----- Order No.18 Date: 17.01.2025 1. The present contempt case has been filed for initiating contempt proceeding against the opposite party no.2 for his wilful and deliberate violation of the order dated 7th December, 2023 passed in W.P.(S) No.1427 of 2023 and other analogous cases. 2. Mr. Ajit Kumar, learned A.C. to G.A.V, refers to paragraph no.5 of the show cause affidavit dated 28th October, 2024 filed on behalf of the opposite party no.2 (wrongly mentioned as opposite party no.3), which reads as under:- “5. That it is most respectfully and humbly submitted that in view of the aforesaid order the Secretary, incharge Department of School Education and Literacy Department after reviewing relevant documents provided by the Secretary, Department of Planning - cum- Finance Department has passed a reasoned order rejecting the claims of the petitioner vide order no.336/ Vidhi dated 10.06.2024.” 3. It is, thus, submitted that the aforesaid order of this Court has been complied. 4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering that in compliance of the order of this Court, the opposite party -2- Cont. Case (Civil) No.286 of 2024 no.2 has passed the order no.336/Vidhi dated 10th June, 2024 (Annexure-A to the said show cause affidavit), this Court does not wish to further proceed in the matter. The contempt proceeding as against the opposite party no.2 is hereby dropped. 5. The present contempt case stands disposed of. 6. The petitioner is, however, at liberty to take appropriate recourse against the aforesaid order dated 10th June, 2024 passed by the opposite party no.2 as permissible under law. 7. I.A. No.3971 of 2024 is also disposed of. (Rajesh Shankar, J.) Sanjay/ -3- Cont. Case (Civil) No.286 of 2024