Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 100848 (ALL)

SATYANARAYAN v. State of UP AND 6 OTHERS

WRIC/32419/2024 · 2025-03-18

S Q H Rizvi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 32419 of 2024 Petitioner :- Satyanarayan Respondent :- State Of Up And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinod Kr Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pradeep Singh Hon'ble Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J. 1. Sri Vinod Kr Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Awadhesh Kumar Patel, learned standing counsel for the State- respondents and Sri Pradeep Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Gaon Sabha are present. 2. At the very outset, Sri Vinod Kr Pandey, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner made an statement that the present writ petition suffers from incurable defects and as such he does not want to press this writ petition at this stage. He prays for a liberty to the petitioner to file fresh writ petition with better pleadings. 3. In view of the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with the liberty to the petitioner to file fresh writ petition with better pleadings. Order Date :- 19.3.2025 Arif Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD ARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad