Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10084 (JHR)

OM ENTERPRISES THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY DHARMENDRA KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/1333/2021 · 2025-07-01

Rajesh Shankar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:17241-DB 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 1333 of 2021 Om Enterprises, having its registered office at Nazafgarh, New Delhi through its authorized signatory Dharmendra Kumar, son of Nandu Ram, resident of Raja Hata Lane, P.O.- G.P.O., P.S.- Kotwali, District- Ranchi … … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Health, Medical Education and Family Welfare, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi 3. The Director, Department of Information Technology e- Governance, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi 4. The Union of India through the Department of Commerce, New Delhi 5. The Chief Executive Officer, Government e-Marketplace, Department of Commerce, New Delhi 6. The Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, RIMS Circle, Bariatu, Ranchi 7. The Director, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, RIMS Circle, Bariatu, Ranchi … … Respondents With W.P.(C) No. 3637 of 2020 Life Line Services, Rajouri Garden, New Delhi through its authorized signatory Nitesh Kumar, son of Shashi Kumar Singh, resident of Sitamarhi, P.O., P.S. & District- Sitamarhi … … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through the Principal Secretary, Department of Health, Medical Education and Family Welfare, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi 2. The Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, RIMS Circle, Bariatu, Ranchi 3. The Director, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, RIMS Circle, Bariatu, Ranchi … … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioners : Mr. Chanchal Jain, Advocate Mr. Vikash Kumar, Advocate For the Resp.-RIMS : Dr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Intervener(s) : M/s. A.K. Rashidi, Md. Azam & Aulia Begum, Advocates ----- Order No. 04 Dated: 01.07.2025 Counsel for the petitioners states that the matters have 2025:JHHC:17241-DB 2 become infructuous. 2. The writ petitions are, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous. (M. S. Ramachandra Rao, C.J.) (Rajesh Shankar, J.) Manish/Ritesh