RAJESHKUMAR @ PULSAR RAJESH v. The STATE REP.BY The Inspector of Police
CRL OP/25880/2025 · 2025-09-19
K Rajasekar
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 100830 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 100830 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Crl.O.P.No.25880 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 19-09-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR CRL OP NO.25880 of 2025 Rajesh Kumar @ Pulsar Rajesh ... Petitioner
Vs The State rep. by, The Inspector of Police, E-5 Sholavaram Police Station, Chennai (Crime No.444 of 2025) ... Respondent
PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to grant bail to the petitioners/accused in Crime No.444 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner(s) : Mr.D. Padmanabhan For Respondent(s) : Mr. A. Gopinath
Government Advocate (Crl. Side) ******* 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.25880 of 2025 ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 14.07.2025, for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3),296(b),115(2), 109,125,351(3) of BNS Act in Crime No.444 of 2025, registered on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner joined hands with other accused and assaulted the defacto complainant with knife and also also abused him with unparliamentary language. Hence, this case.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court and sought for bail to the petitioner.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent while opposing the bail to the petitioner, reiterated the prosecution case and states that there are 13 previous cases pending against the petitioner. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.25880 of 2025 5.Considering the facts, gravity of offence and the bad antecedent of the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 6.Accordingly, this criminal original petition stands dismissed. 19.09.2025 smn To
1. The Inspector of Police, E-5 Sholavaram Police Station, Chennai
2. The Judicial Magistrate-2, Ponneri, Thiruvallur District.
3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.25880 of 2025 K. RAJASEKAR, J. smn Crl.O.P. No.25880 of 2025 19.09.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis