Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 100813 (ALL)

SHRIPATI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

A482/33111/2024 · 2025-05-26

Saurabh Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:89764 Court No. - 74 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 33111 of 2024 Applicant :- Shripati Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Vrij Raj Verma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Rajendra Prasad Mishra,Satyam Mishra,Swati Mishra Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J. 1. Heard Shri Vrij Raj Verma, appeared on behalf of the applicant and Shri R.P. Mishra, learned counsel for opposite party no.2. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the instant application has been preferred only for seeking direction to expedite pendency of Criminal case no. 20 of 2010-11 arising out of Case crime no. 266 and 267 both of 2010 under Sections 198A(2) wherein opposite party no.2 has been implicated as accused, but the same is pending for considerable period of time and as such pendency of the matter is adversely affecting the legitimate right and interest of the applicant. 3. After hearing the submission of learned counsel for the applicant and the prayer made through the instant application cannot be acceded in pursuance to Section 482 of Cr.P.C since power vests under the aforesaid section is inherent but at the same time power to supervise the learned court below is vest with Section 483 Cr.P.C as well as Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 4. In view of the aforementioned facts and circumstances of the case and submissions made above, the instant application is hereby dismissed. However, applicant is at liberty to avail other remedy available at law for redressal of his grievances. Order Date :- 27.5.2025 Rakesh Digitally signed by :- RAKESH SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad