RASUL HOQUE @ RASUL HOQUE BAHADUR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM
I.A.(Crl.)/293/2025 · 2025-03-27
Susmita Phukan Khaund
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10081 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10081 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010068442025
2025:GAU-AS:3710
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/293/2025 RASUL HOQUE @ RASUL HOQUE BAHADUR S/O- LATE FAYZAL HOQUE, R/O- WARD NO. 14, HOQUE NAGAR, P.S- DHUBRI, DIST- DHUBRI, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR H R A CHOUDHURY, MR. I U CHOWDHURY,MR. A AHMED Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND ORDER 28.03.2025
Heard Mr. H.R.A. Choudhury, learned Senior Counsel for the applicant Rasul Hoque @ Rasul Hoque Bahadur.
2. The applicant through this petition has prayed for extension of time,
Page No.# 2/2 allowing him to appear before the Investigating Officer. It is submitted that the applicant was granted interim bail vide the order of this Court dated 18.02.2025 in connection with AB No. 374/2025 to appear before the Investigating Officer within 10 (Ten) days.
3. The applicant was unable to appear as he was suffering from health conditions.
4. Heard Mr. D.P. Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam.
5. Considering all aspects, interlocutory application is allowed. The applicant is hereby allowed two weeks time from today to appear before the Investigating Officer.
6. In terms of the above observation, this I.A. stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant