CWP 27425 of 2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 125 CWP 27425 of 2025 Date of Decision:15.09.2025 Jagraj Singh and another ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.S.SHEKHAWAT Present : Karmanbir Singh Kharbanda, Advocate for the petitioners. N.S.SHEKHAWAT , J. (Oral) 1. The petitioners have filed the present petition with a prayer to issue a writ in the nature of certiorari directing the respondents to quash the order dated 21.12.2011 (Annexure P-8), orders dated 02.07.2012 and 18.07.2012 (Annexures P-9 and P-10), whereby, the petitioners were not granted the pay scales which had been given to the employees working on equivalent posts in the administrative wing. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have already submitted a representation dated 30.08.2025 (Annexure P-20) to the respondents and he shall be satisfied in case the appropriate directions are issued to the respondents, if the said representation is decided in a time bound manner. AMIT RANA 2025.09.16 17:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judgement/order CWP 27425 of 2025 -2- 3. Notice of motion. 4. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Surya Kumar, AAG, Punjab who is present in the Court, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents and has no serious objection to the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners, at this stage. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record carefully. 6. At this stage, the respondent No.3 is directed to decide the representation dated 30.08.2025 (Annexure P-20) submitted by the petitioners within a period of four months of date of receipt of certified copy of this order in the light of the judgment passed by this Court in CWP 25517 of 2012 titled as “Dr. Ranjit Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and others” decided on 06.10.2017 and all other relevant rules/instructions of the respondents-department. 7. It is expected that respondent No.3 shall pass a speaking and well reasoned order and in case, it is found that the petitioners are entitled to any relief, all consequential benefits may also be allowed to them, in accordance with law. 8. Disposed of in the aforesaid terms. 15.09.2025 (N.S.SHEKHAWAT) amit rana JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No AMIT RANA 2025.09.16 17:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judgement/order