MAHIPAL SINGH NARUKA S/O LATE SHRI CHANDAN SINGH NARUKA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/3372/2025 · 2025-03-10
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10079 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10079 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:10732] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3372/2025 Mahipal Singh Naruka S/o Late Shri Chandan Singh Naruka, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Bhakari, Post Chandupura, Tehsil Rajgarh, Distt. Alwar (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Rural Development And Panchayati Raj, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Commissioner Cum-Secretary, Department Of Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Secretariat, Jaipur.
3. The Chief Exeuctive Officer, Zila Parishad, Alwar (Raj.)
4. The Vikas Adhikari, Panchayat Samiti Reni, District Alwar (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singodiya JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order 10/03/2025
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied in case a direction is issued to the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner for redressal of his grievances in expeditious manner.
2. The prayer of the petitioner appears to be genuine.
3. The instant writ petition stands disposed of with direction to the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner (pending, if any) expeditiously, as early as possible.
[2025:RJ-JP:10732] (2 of 2) [CW-3372/2025]
4. The stay application and all pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
5. Before parting with the order, it is made clear that this Court has not passed any direction to the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner in a particular way. The respondents would be at liberty to decide the same strictly in accordance with law.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/10