NEENA SARAF v. AJIT KUMAR SAHU SECY.P.H.E.DEPTT.AND ORS.
CCP(S)/341/2019 · 2025-11-26
Javed Iqbal Wani
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10079 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10079 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CCP(S) No. 341/2019
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Case No. CCP(S) No. 341/2019
Date of Pronouncement:-26.11.2025 Uploaded on:- 28.11.2025
Neena Saraf
…..Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Imran Ahmed Rather, Advocate
Q
Vs
Ajit Kumar Sahu & Ors. .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Priyanka Bhat, Advocate vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAVED IQBAL WANI, JUDGE
ORDER(ORAL)
1. In the instant contempt petition, the respondents pursuant to order of disposal of the petition filed by the petitioner on 30.11.2018 came to be directed to accord consideration to the petitioner’s claim in light of the averments made in the petition, documents appended thereto, having regard to the treatment given to the similarly circumstanced candidates in accordance with rules occupying the field and to take a decision within eight weeks’ time.
2. Compliance report has been filed by the respondents wherein it is inter-alia, stated that the case of the petitioner stands considered and found devoid of any merit and, accordingly, rejected. The consideration order dated 27.09.2023 is also stated to have been passed.
3. In view of the aforesaid position obtaining in the matter, the respondents/contemnors have complied with the order, non-compliance of which is alleged in the instant contempt petition. Accordingly, the contempt notice issued is recalled and proceedings are closed with liberty to the S. No. 92
CCP(S) No. 341/2019
petitioner to workout the remedy against the consideration order, if cause survives.
(Javed Iqbal Wani)
Judge Jammu 26.11.2025 Diksha