TARA SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/14650/2025 · 2025-09-24
Manju Rani Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 100789 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 100789 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14650 of 2025 Court No. - 52 HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J. Heard Mr. Aman Srivastava, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Shreesh Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Shivendra Kumar Singh,
learned counsel for respondent nos.2 and 3 and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. The present writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:-
"(i) Issue writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, directing the District Basic Education Officer, Moradabad to pay the honorarium in terms of the decision taken by the Executive Committee, Education for all project, dated 21.12.2017 as it has been paid to the other similar employees with respect to enhancement of honorarium since similarly situated District Coordinators (Integrated Education) working in different districts are paid higher honorarium than the petitioner. (ii) Issue writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari to quash the order dated 05.07.2023 passed by respondent no.3. (iii) Any other suitable, writ, order or direction, as this Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the present case."
Learned counsel for the petitioners relying upon the order dated 18.03.2021 passed in Writ A No.4075 of 2021, requests for the same relief.
Learned counsel for the respondent-BSA submits that the claim of the petitioner has to be considered by District Basic Education Officer. Therefore, in case fresh representation is given by the petitioners before the respondent no.3, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law. Considering the facts and circumstance of the case but without expressing Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shreesh Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Shivendra Kumar Singh Tara Singh And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
any opinion on the merits of the case set up on behalf of the petitioners, the present writ petition is disposed of by providing that petitioners may make fresh applications/representations, ventilating all their grievances, supported by such documents, as may be advised, before the respondent no.3 District Basic Education Officer, Moradabad, within three weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order. On such representation being made, respondent no.3 shall make all endeavours to consider and decide the same, strictly in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order, after giving proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment. September 25, 2025 Rahul.
WRIA No. 14650 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAHUL GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad