163 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA SUNNY KRISHAN KUMAR, IAS AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. Harsh Chopra, Mr. Athar Ahmed, DAG, Punjab HARKESH MANUJA Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in terms of contents made in Para 4 of the reply, no cause survives in the present petition. The contents of Para 4 of the reply are extracted hereunder: “That it is respectfully submitted that in view of the order dated 03.09.2024 passed by this Hon'ble Court in CA No. 254 of 2022, and the order dated 04.11.2024 the conditional appointment letter issued to Raksha Devi i.e. respondent no. 4 has been reverte no.1/947553/2024 dated 11.10.2024 annexed as Annexure R and office order memo no. 7857/76 annexed as Annexure R In view thereof, the present petition stands disposed of. Rule dischar 02.04.2025 Tejwinder IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: Versus KRISHAN KUMAR, IAS AND OTHERS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Harsh Chopra, Advocate for the Mr. Athar Ahmed, DAG, Punjab **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in terms of contents made in Para 4 of the reply, no cause survives in the present petition. The contents of Para 4 of the reply are extracted hereunder: “That it is respectfully submitted that in view of the order dated 03.09.2024 passed by this Hon'ble Court in CA No. 254 of 2022, and the order dated 04.11.2024 the conditional appointment letter issued to Raksha Devi i.e. respondent no. 4 has been reverted back by the department vide order having memo no.1/947553/2024 dated 11.10.2024 annexed as Annexure R and office order memo no. 7857/76 annexed as Annexure R-2.” In view thereof, the present petition stands disposed of. Rule discharged. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-4228-2024 Date of Decision: April 02, 2025 ........Petitioner ........Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Athar Ahmed, DAG, Punjab Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in terms of contents made in Para 4 of the reply, no cause survives in the present petition. The contents of Para 4 of the reply are extracted hereunder:- “That it is respectfully submitted that in view of the order dated 03.09.2024 passed by this Hon'ble Court in CA No. 254 of 2022, and the order dated 04.11.2024 the conditional appointment letter issued to Raksha Devi i.e. respondent no. 4 has been d back by the department vide order having memo no.1/947553/2024 dated 11.10.2024 annexed as Annexure R-1 and office order memo no. 7857/76-G dated 26.11.2024 In view thereof, the present petition stands disposed of. (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No 2024 April 02, 2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in terms of contents made in Para 4 of the reply, no cause survives in the present “That it is respectfully submitted that in view of the order dated 03.09.2024 passed by this Hon'ble Court in CA No. 254 of 2022, and the order dated 04.11.2024 the conditional appointment letter issued to Raksha Devi i.e. respondent no. 4 has been d back by the department vide order having memo 1 G dated 26.11.2024 TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.04.03 09:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document