Sudhanshu Kumar Singh @ Sudhanshu Kr. Singh v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./6409/2025 · 2025-03-17
Prabhat Kumar Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10077 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10077 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6409 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-665 Year-2024 Thana- SONEPUR District- Saran ====================================================== Sudhanshu Kumar Singh @ Sudhanshu Kr. Singh Son of Late Radhe Mohan Singh village- Murthan, PS- Sonepur, dist- Saran At Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, Advocate Mrs.Vaishnavi Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Vinod Shanker Modi, A.P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Tiwary, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 3 17-03-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, informant and the State.
2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352, 351(2), 351(3), 4(3), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
3. Prosecution case, in brief, is that on 31.7.24 at about 10 PM, this petitioner along with other F.I.R. named accused persons and 2-3 unknown persons came at the house of informant and made indiscriminate firing and pelted bricks and stones.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that both parties are gotiyas and due to land dispute this false and concocted has been lodged. Though there is allegation of firing
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6409 of 2025(3) dt.17-03-2025 2/2 but no one sustained any firearms injury. Petitioner claims clean antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant vehemently opposed the bail application.
6. Considering the relationship between parties, nature of dispute, clean antecedent and other facts and circumstances of the case, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra in connection with Sonepur P. S. Case No. 665 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
Navya/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T