BALWINDER SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CWP/27302/2025 · 2025-09-12
N S Shekhawat
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 100735 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 100735 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-27302-2025 -1- 118 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-27302-2025 Date of Decision:12.09.2025 Balwinder Singh and others …Petitioners vs. State of Punjab and others …Respondents
Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present : Mr. Nitesh Singla, Advocate for the petitioners. *** N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral)
1. The petitioners have filed the present writ petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India with a prayer to issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to immediately extend to the petitioners all statutory benefits contained in the Punjab Civil Service Rules includes Assured Career Progression Scheme, New Pension Scheme or Old Pension Scheme, as applicable to regular government employees based on their date of appointment, Contributory Provident Fund and appropriate deductions for Provident Fund, all types of leaves and allowance, Gratuity, Ex-Gratia Grant,
consideration for appointment on compassionate basis in case of the death of a serving official, as per extent rules applicable to regular government employees. A further prayer has been made to direct the respondents to frame and publish a comprehensive Seniority List for the Computer Faculty, determined precisely on the basis of their respective dates of initial appointment to regular service. It is further prayed that the respondents be directed to treat the petitioners as confirmed in service and to promptly frame a clear and defined channel of HEMLATA 2025.09.14 22:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-27302-2025 -2- promotion for Computer Faculty, ensuring opportunities for career advancement. A further prayer has been made to direct the respondents to re-fix the Grade Pay of the petitioners at par with Vocational Masters, who possess equivalent qualifications with retrospective effect from the date such revision was granted to Vocational Masters, along with all resulting arrears and consequential benefits.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have already submitted a representation dated 19.05.2025 (Annexure P-11) on the respondents and he shall be satisfied in case, appropriate directions are issued to the respondents to decide their representation dated 19.05.2025 (Annexure P-11) in a time bound manner.
3. Notice of motion.
4. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Satnampreet Singh Chauhan, DAG, Punjab, who is present in the Court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and has no serious objection to the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners.
5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record carefully.
6. At this stage, respondent No.2 is directed to decide the representation dated 19.05.2025 (Annexure P-11) submitted by the petitioners, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this
order, by passing a speaking and well reasoned order. It is expected that respondent No.2 shall pass a speaking and well-reasoned order by taking into
consideration the relevant rules, instructions and the settled law. In case it is HEMLATA 2025.09.14 22:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-27302-2025 -3- found that the petitioners are entitled to any consequential relief, the same shall be released to them forthwith along with a reasonable rate of interest.
7. The present petition is disposed of, accordingly.
(N.S.SHEKHAWAT) 12.09.2025
JUDGE hemlata Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No HEMLATA 2025.09.14 22:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document