WP No. 35232 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17-09-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 35232 of 2025 R.Thirumal, S/o. Raja, No.3/22, Nadupatti Village And Post, Bargoor Taluk, Krishnagiri District. Petitioner(s) Vs 1.The District Registrar, District Registrar Office, Thirupattur District. 2.The Joint Sub Registrar No.2, Joint Sub Registrar Office, Thirupattur, Thirupattur District. Respondent(s) PRAYER:-Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for an issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2 nd respondent to receive the petitioner sale deed dated 24.04.2025 and thereby register the same. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 35232 of 2025 For Petitioner(s): Mr.B.Sundarapandiyan For Respondent: Mr.P.Harish, Government Advocate ORDER This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking to direct the 2 nd respondent to receive the petitioner sale deed dated 24.04.2025 and thereby register the same. 2.Mr.P.Harish, learned Government Advocate, takes notice on behalf of the respondents. By consent of the parties, the main writ petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself. 3.Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that, in the present case, the 2 nd respondent refused to receive the sale deed dated 24.04.2025 presented for the purpose of registration and orally informed that the sale deed cannot be registered. Hence, the present writ petition has been filed. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 35232 of 2025 4.Learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents would submit that no sale deed has been presented by the petitioner till date. In the event, the petitioner presented the sale deed, the same will be scrutinized and the respondent will proceed further in accordance with law. 5.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents. 6.Considering the submissions made by either parties, this Court is of the view that as rightly contended by the learned Government Advocate, the refusal will come into picture only when the sale deed is presented and same got rejected through the refusal check slip in writing. In the present case, based on the oral communication, the petitioner failed to present the sale deed. Hence, the petitioner is directed to present the sale deed dated 24.04.2025 for registration and in such case, the respondents shall consider the sale deed for registration in accordance with law. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 35232 of 2025 7.With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 17-09-2025 rst Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 35232 of 2025 To 1.The District Registrar, District Registrar Office, Thirupattur District. 2.The Joint Sub Registrar No.2, Joint Sub Registrar Office, Thirupattur, Thirupattur District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 35232 of 2025 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. rst WP No. 35232 of 2025 17-09-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis