Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11661 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.
2. This petition has been filed for following relief:
"To direct the Civil Judge (Junior Division) Jaunpur to decide the original suit No.1107 of 2019, (Dhanraj Vs. Baburam), pending in the Court of Civil Judge (Junior Division) Jaunpur, within stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court in accordance with law."
3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the suit is pending since 2019. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that several dates have been fixed but the same has not been decided yet. He prayed that the same may be decided expeditiously.
4. No useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.
5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) Jaunpur to consider and decide the aforesaid case, in accordance with law, expeditiously, after ensuring service upon all the parties concerned and after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned as well as opportunity to lead evidence in support of their case and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. September 24, 2025 Ved Prakash Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manoj Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) :
(Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Dhanraj .....Petitioner(s) Baburam .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad