SUBASH CHANDRA YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/34088/2025 · 2025-09-24
Prakash Padia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 100730 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 100730 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 34088 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.
1. The order dated 11.07.2025 passed by District Magistrate, Jaunpur/respondent no.2 pursuant to the provisions contained under Section 12-J of the U.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 is under challenge in the present writ petition.
2. By the aforesaid order, after the elected Gram Pradhan was sent to jail one Smt. Swarnima wife of Sujeet Kumar Maurya, member of Gram Panchayat was nominated to look into the affairs of the Gram Pradhan.
3. Nothing has been stated in the entire writ petition nor any argument has been raised that under what circumstances the order passed by the respondent no.2 dated 11.07.2025 is bad in the eyes of law. In this view of the matter, present writ petition is liable to be dismissed.
4. At this point of time, it is argued by counsel for the petitioner that objection submitted by the petitioner against the aforesaid order is pending consideration before the respondent no.2 hence respondent no.2 be directed to pass appropriate orders on the aforesaid representation.
5. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, present writ petition is being disposed of at the admission stage itself.
6. In the facts and circumstances of the case, without interfering with the order, which is under challenge, present writ petition is disposed of permitting the petitioner to place all his grievances as has been raised in Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rakesh Kumar Singh, Sanjay Vikram Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, C.S.C. Subash Chandra Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
the present writ petition by way of filing of representation before the respondent no.2-District Magistrate, Jaunpur within three weeks from today. If it is so the respondent no.2 is directed to decide the same strictly in accordance with law within a period of two months, thereafter. September 25, 2025 Pramod Tripathi WRIC No. 34088 of 2025 2 (Prakash Padia,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRAMOD TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad