Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10073 (GAU)

JANMEJOY AGARWALA AND 9 ORS v. N.F. RAILWAY AND 2 ORS

PIL/21/2025 · 2025-04-04

N Unni Krishnan Nair

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010067492025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : PIL/21/2025 1.JANMEJOY AGARWALA AND 9 ORS S/O- LATE GAGAN CHANDRA AGARWALA, VILL.- MURKONGSELEK, P.O. AND P.S. JONAI, DIST. DHEMAJI, ASSAM 2: CHANDIRAM PEGU S/O- LATE UBHOY PEGU VILL- LAKHI NEPALI-787060 P.O. AND P.S. JONAI DIST. DHEMAJI ASSAM 3: MEDINI MOHAN PEGU S/O- LATE TULAI PEGU VILL- LAKHI NEPALI P.O. AND P.S. JONAI DIST. DHEMAJI ASSAM 4: GIRIN DOLEY S/O- LATE SUNANDA DOLEY VILL- LAKHI NEPALI P.O. AND P.S. JONAI DIST. DHEMAJI ASSAM 5: BENUDHAR PATIR S/O- MANDASING PATIR VILL- LAKHI NEPALI P.O. AND P.S. JONAI DIST. DHEMAJI ASSAM 6: GANESWAR PATIR S/O- LATE KASINATH PATIR VILL- LAKHI NEPALI P.O. AND P.S. JONAI DIST. DHEMAJI ASSAM 7: UMESH TAYE S/O- LATE TUKHESWAR TAYE VILL- LAKHI NEPALI P.O. AND P.S. JONAI DIST. DHEMAJI ASSAM Page No.# 2/3 8: CHATTU PRASAD SAH S/O- LATE BHAGAWATI PRASAD SAH VILL- LAKHI NEPALI P.O. AND P.S. JONAI DIST. DHEMAJI ASSAM 9: AZIM ANSARI S/O- LATE GAFUR ANSARI VILL- LAKHI NEPALI P.O. AND P.S. JONAI DIST. DHEMAJI ASSAM 10: JAY CHANDRA DOLEY S/O- LATE BIRSON DOLEY VILL- LAKHI NEPALI P.O. AND P.S. JONAI DIST. DHEMAJI ASSA VERSUS 1.N.F. RAILWAY AND 2 ORS REPRESENTED BY GENERAL MANAGER (CONSTRUCTION), N.F. RAILWAY, MALIGAON, GUWAHATI, ASSAM 2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER DHEMAJI DIST. DHEMAJI ASSAM 3:THE CO-DISTRICT COMMISSIONER JONAI CO-DISTRICT JONAI ASSA For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. R. Ali, Advocate. For the Respondent(s) : Ms. B. Sarma, Central Government Counsel. : Mr. N. Das, Government Advocate, Assam. – BEFORE – HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. VIJAY BISHNOI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR 05.04.2025 (Vijay Bishnoi, CJ) After arguing the matter for quite some time, Mr. R. Ali, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, on instruction, has submitted that he may be allowed to withdraw this PIL petition. However, he prays that liberty may be granted to the petitioners to raise their grievances before the appropriate Page No.# 3/3 authority at appropriate level. In view above, this PIL petition stands dismissed, as withdrawn with the liberty, as prayed for. JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Comparing Assistant