HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11647 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard Shri Shashank Shekhar Mishra, Advocate holding brief of Shri Nipun Singh learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. This writ petition has been filed for the following relief: "Direct the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), GautamBuddh Nagar to decide the 6C application dated 13.12.2024 filed by the plaintiff/respondent under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 read with section 151 of C.P.C. in Original Suit No.2087 of 2024 (Raj Singh Vs. Mahipal & Others), expeditiously, within a time bound period as may be directed by this Hon'ble Court preferably within a period of one month." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction (6C Application) is pending since 2024 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Gautam Buddh Nagar to consider and decide the interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the concerned parties as well as giving opportunity Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Abhijeet Mishra, Nipun Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Kaushalendra Nath Singh Mahipal .....Petitioner(s) Raj Singh And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. September 24, 2025 Ved Prakash A227 No. 11647 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad