IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 117 PARDEEP SINGH STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present: Mr. *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel submits that regarding the claim as raised in the present petition, submitted, which may be directed to be decided in a time bound manner, keeping in view the judgment passed in CRM-M-38940 2. N 3. Mr. MS Bajwa, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State and has no objection to the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. In view of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of wit look into the representation aforesaid order, 17.09.2025 ashok Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M Date of decision: PARDEEP SINGH Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Kirat Pal Dhaliwal, Advocate for the petitioner. *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) Learned counsel submits that regarding the claim as raised in the present petition, a representation dated 03.09.2025 (Annexure P3) has been submitted, which may be directed to be decided in a time bound manner, keeping judgment passed in Sonu Kumar vs. State of 38940-2025, decided on 24.07.2025. Notice of motion. Mr. MS Bajwa, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the State and has no objection to the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of the above and without commenting upon the mer case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 representation of the petitioner dated aforesaid order, in accordance with law. ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH M-51992-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 17.09.2025 ..Petitioner ..Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY , Advocate for the petitioner. Learned counsel submits that regarding the claim as raised in the representation dated 03.09.2025 (Annexure P3) has been submitted, which may be directed to be decided in a time bound manner, keeping Sonu Kumar vs. State of Haryana and others, Mr. MS Bajwa, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the State and has no objection to the limited prayer made by learned and without commenting upon the merits of the h a direction to respondent No.2 dated 03.09.2025, taking note of the ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No Learned counsel submits that regarding the claim as raised in the representation dated 03.09.2025 (Annexure P3) has been submitted, which may be directed to be decided in a time bound manner, keeping Haryana and others, Mr. MS Bajwa, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the State and has no objection to the limited prayer made by learned its of the h a direction to respondent No.2 to taking note of the ASHOK KUMAR 2025.09.17 18:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document