HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 7872 of 2025 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J. 1. Heard counsel for the applicant, Sri Neeraj Kumar Sharma, learned AGA for the State and perused the material on record. 2. This application has been filed with the prayer to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant in Case Crime No. 339 of 2025, under Sections 3/5/8 Cow Slaughter Act, Police Station Baheri, District- Bareilly, during the pendency of trial. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant was not named in the F.I.R. and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The name of the applicant was disclosed by co-accused Danish alias Raju in police custody. The said statement insofar as it implicates the applicant is unreliable. At this stage there is no credible evidence to link the applicant with the offence. During the course of investigation, the applicant was granted protection till submission of police report by this Court vide order dated 30.04.2025 in Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No.8508 of 2025. Investigation has been completed. Charge-sheet has been filed. The applicant had cooperated in the investigation. The applicant has been summoned by the concerned Court. No custodial interrogation is required. The criminal history of the applicant has been explained in paragraph no.21 of the application. The applicant has apprehension of his arrest in the above mentioned case. In case, the applicant is granted anticipatory bail, he will not misuse the said liberty. 4. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail but could not Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Abdul Mazeed, Shahla Naz Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Imran .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record. 5. Having regard to the submissions made, considering the nature of accusations, antecedents of the applicant, and the fact that the applicant was not named in the F.I.R; the name of the applicant was disclosed by co- accused Danish alias Raju in the police custody; and at this stage there is no substantive evidence against the applicant; during the course of investigation, the applicant was granted protection till submission of police report by this Court; the applicant had cooperated in the investigation; and no custodial interrogation is required; without commenting on merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled for anticipatory bail. 6. In the event of arrest, the applicant- Imran, involved in the aforesaid case crime be released on anticipatory bail during pendency of trial, on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall make himself available on each date fixed in the matter by the court concerned; (ii) the applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade from disclosing such facts to the Court; (iii) the applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if he has passport the same shall be deposited by him before the concerned court. 7. In default of any of the conditions, the court concerned is at liberty to pass appropriate orders for enforcing and compelling the same. 8. The application stands disposed of. September 24, 2025 Sanjeet NABAIL No. 7872 of 2025 2 (Vivek Varma,J.) Digitally signed by :- SANJEET KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad