CRP(PD).No.614 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 15.04.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA CRP.(PD).No.614 of 2025 and C.M.P.No.3475 of 2025 A.Archana ... Petitioner Vs. N.Manokaran ... Respondent Prayer:- Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the Fair and Final Orders dated 18.09.2024 passed in IA.No.3 of 2024 in HMOP.No.475 of 2022 on the file of the Family Judge, Salem and allow the above CRP. For Petitioner : M/s. R.Nalliyappan For Respondent : Served - No appearance O R D E R Challenging the order passed by the learned Family Judge, Salem in IA.No.3 of 2024 in HMOP.No.475 of 2022 in and by which the learned Judge has permitted the respondent/husband to visit his minor son, N.Asvath twice a month on the 2nd and 4th Sunday between 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP(PD).No.614 of 2025 10.00 am to 01.00 pm at the respondent's house or else preferably park or temple till the disposal of the main HMOP, the petitioner/wife is before this Court. 2. I.A.No.3 of 2024 has been filed by the respondent/husband seeking visitation rights to meet his minor son. 3. The petitioner/wife had challenged the application stating that the respondent/husband had threatened to kill the child. 4. The learned Family Judge, Salem after considering the arguments of both parties has held that the child requires the love and affection of both parents even if they are separated. Ultimately, taking into account the interest of the minor the learned Judge had allowed the application. Challenging the same the petitioner/wife is before this Court. 5. Heard the counsel for the petitioner and perused the records. 6. The only ground that has been raised is a stray statement 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP(PD).No.614 of 2025 made by the petitioner/wife that the respondent/husband would kill the child. The fact that the respondent/husband has taken out an application seeking visitation rights would only go to show that he wants to establish a tie with his child as a father. He is also entitled to give his love and affection to the child. The allegation that the respondent/husband had threatened to kill the child remains an allegation only as there is nothing to substantiate the same. Therefore, the order passed by the learned Family Judge, Salem is very much in order and I see no reason to interfere with the same. 7. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 15.04.2025 (shr) Index : Yes/No Speaking Order: Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No To 1.The Family Judge, Salem P.T. ASHA . J., 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP(PD).No.614 of 2025 (shr) CRP.(PD).No.614 of 2025 and C.M.P.No.3475 of 2025 15.04.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis