IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 115 Nitan Indoria Shri Ajoy Kumar Sinha, Punjab State Power Corporation Limited, PSPCL CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA proceedings order dated of this Court in CWP State Power Corporation Limited and others”, vide which the petition was disposed of with a direction and decide the legal notice dated 14.3.2025 (Annexure P by the petitioner, within a peri of certified copy of this order by passing a speaking order in accordance with law.” necessary compliance has been made, while passing a speaking order COCP-4691-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.4691 of 2025 Date of decision : Nitan Indoria Versus Shri Ajoy Kumar Sinha, Chairman Punjab State Power Corporation Limited, PSPCL CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Nikhil Anand, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate for the respondent. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that proceedings be initiated against the respondent order dated 22.5.2025 (Annexure P-1) passed by a co of this Court in CWP-14950-2025 titled as “ State Power Corporation Limited and others”, vide which the petition was disposed of with a direction “….to respondent No.1 to consider and decide the legal notice dated 14.3.2025 (Annexure P by the petitioner, within a period of 08 weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order by passing a speaking order in accordance with law.” Learned counsel for the respondent necessary compliance has been made, while passing a speaking order 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 4691 of 2025 (O & M) Date of decision :-15.09.2025 …..Petitioner Chairman-cum-Managing Director, Punjab State Power Corporation Limited, PSPCL …..Respondent HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Nikhil Anand, Advocate Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that contempt against the respondents for not complying the 1) passed by a co-ordinate Bench titled as “Nitan Indoria vs. Punjab State Power Corporation Limited and others”, vide which the petition “….to respondent No.1 to consider and decide the legal notice dated 14.3.2025 (Annexure P-18) served od of 08 weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order by passing a speaking order in Learned counsel for the respondent-State submits that necessary compliance has been made, while passing a speaking order VIJAY ASIJA 2025.09.18 10.27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document dated 12.09.2025 in the present petition. by the learned counsel for the respondent Copy thereof is supplied to learned counsel Registry to tag/paginate the same at appropriate place in the paper book. compliance of the order dated 22.5.2025 (Annexure P done and the Speaking Order dated respondent of with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the said Speaking Order dated 12.09.2025 petition is aforesaid Speaking Order as per law. September Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No COCP-4691-2025 (O & M) 12.09.2025 by the respondent-authority; thus, no cause survives in the present petition. Copy of the aforesaid order dated by the learned counsel for the respondent Copy thereof is supplied to learned counsel Registry to tag/paginate the same at appropriate place in the paper Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the compliance of the order dated 22.5.2025 (Annexure P done and the Speaking Order dated 12.09.2025 respondent-authority, the present contempt petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the said Speaking Order 12.09.2025 in accordance with law. Heard. In view of the facts noted above, th petition is disposed of accordingly. The petitioner would be at liberty to challenge the aforesaid Speaking Order as per law. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand September 15, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 authority; thus, no cause survives Copy of the aforesaid order dated 12.09.2025 produced by the learned counsel for the respondent-State is taken on record. Copy thereof is supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner. Registry to tag/paginate the same at appropriate place in the paper- Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the compliance of the order dated 22.5.2025 (Annexure P-1) has been 09.2025 has been passed by the authority, the present contempt petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the said Speaking Order in accordance with law. In view of the facts noted above, the present contempt The petitioner would be at liberty to challenge the Pending application(s), if any, shall stand(s) disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.09.18 10.27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document