Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 100676 (PAT)

Manoj Ray v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./70609/2025 · 2025-09-26

Ashok Kumar Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70609 of 2025 In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46080 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-245 Year-2024 Thana- DERNI BAZAR District- Saran ====================================================== 1. Manoj Ray Son of Late Sabhapati Ray Village- Khirikiya P.S -Derni District -Saran At Chapra 2. Anshu Kumar son of Pramod Ray Village- Khirikiya P.S -Derni District -Saran At Chapra 3. Om Prakash Yadav @ Lalu Kumar son of Suman Ray Village- Khirikiya P.S -Derni District -Saran At Chapra 4. vikki Kumar son of Suman Ray Village- Khirikiya P.S -Derni District -Saran At Chapra 5. Pawan Kumar @ Pawan @ Anirudh Son of Baharan Ray Village- Nawada (Sutihar), Ps- Derni, Dist- Saran at chapra 6. Guddu Kumar Son of Late Bhagirath Ray Village- silhauri, Ps- Madhourah, Dist- Saran at Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rakesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 26-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner nos. 1, 3 and 5 have filed the instant application for modification of the order dated 05.08.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 46080 of 2025 whereby while granting bail to the petitioners in connection with Derni (Derni Bazar) P.S. 245 of 2024, the petitioners were directed to surrender in Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70609 of 2025(2) dt.26-09-2025 2/2 the Court below within a period of four weeks. 3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners due to unavoidable circumstances, the petitioner nos. 1, 3 and 5 could not surrender before the learned trial court within the stipulated period of time as mentioned in the order dated 05.08.2025. 4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner and the contents of the modification application, the court is inclined to allow the prayer of the petitioner. 5. The order dated 05.08.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No 46080 of 2025 is modified and the time granted to the petitioner nos. 1, 3 and 5 in the said order to surrender in the court below is extended by a further period of four weeks from today. 6. The remaining part of the order shall remain unchanged. 7. The application stands allowed to the above extent. Sudhanshu/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T