Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 100673 (PNJ)

GOURAV KUMAR v. PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK AND OTHERS

CWP/27171/2025 · 2025-09-12

Sandeep Moudgil

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[116] Gourav Kumar Punjab National Bank and others Coram : Present : SANDEEP MOUDGIL [1] 226/227 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a writ in the of Mandamus for issuance of direction to respondent Nos.1 to 3 to consider the claim of the petitioner for employment on the basis of compassionate grounds under the scheme for compassionate appointment. [2] [3] who has been served with an advance copy, respondent (Annexure P of 06 weeks from providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, in accordance with law and a copy of said speaking order wi one week thereafter. [4] 12.09.2025 ‘Rajneesh' IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-27171 Date of Decision : Gourav Kumar versus Punjab National Bank and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICESANDEEP MOUDGIL Mr. Dinesh Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner. *** SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J. (ORAL) The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a writ in the of Mandamus for issuance of direction to respondent Nos.1 to 3 to consider the claim of the petitioner for employment on the basis of compassionate grounds under the scheme for compassionate appointment. Notice of motion. Ms. Preeti Grover, Advocate who has been served with an advance copy, respondent-Bank and assures the Court that representation dated (Annexure P-6) will be decided by passing a speaking order within a period of 06 weeks from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order, providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, in accordance with law and a copy of said speaking order will be supplied to the petitioner within one week thereafter. The petition in the aforesaid terms stands disposed off. 12.09.2025 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 27171-2025 Date of Decision :12.09.2025 …Petitioner versus ….Respondents SANDEEP MOUDGIL Advocate for the petitioner. The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus for issuance of direction to respondent Nos.1 to 3 to consider the claim of the petitioner for employment on the basis of compassionate grounds under the scheme for compassionate appointment. Advocate for Mr. Saurav Verma, Advocate who has been served with an advance copy, accepts notice on behalf of and assures the Court that representation dated 06.09.2025 ) will be decided by passing a speaking order within a period the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order, after providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, in accordance with law ll be supplied to the petitioner within The petition in the aforesaid terms stands disposed off. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Articles nature of Mandamus for issuance of direction to respondent Nos.1 to 3 to consider the claim of the petitioner for employment on the basis of compassionate Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the 06.09.2025 ) will be decided by passing a speaking order within a period after providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, in accordance with law ll be supplied to the petitioner within ) RAJNEESH SHARMA 2025.09.15 10:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document