HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11662 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The present petition has been filed challenging the order dated 09.04.2025 allowing the application filed by the wife under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act. 3.Against the order impugned passed under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, the petitioner has an alternative remedy of filing an appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 in view of the judgment of Full Bench of this Court in case of Kiran Bala Srivastava Vs. Jai Prakash Srivastava ; MANU/UP/2771/2004 passed in First Appeal No.17 of 2002 decided on 10.9.2004. 4. Since the petitioner has an alternative remedy, I am not inclined to entertain the instant petition. 5. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy as available to him under law. 6. Certified copy of the orders, if any, be returned to learned counsel for the petitioner after retaining photo copy of the same. September 24, 2025 Ved Prakash Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Aman Pandey, Shiv Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Suryanath Bind .....Petitioner(s) Rajani Devi .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad