[2025:RJ-JP:10660] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3398/2025 1. Arun Prakash S/o Vidhyadhar, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village Hameerwas, Post Nua, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. 2. Ramratan S/o Bhageerath, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village And Post Bassi, Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. Nitish Yadav S/o Shivnarayan Yadav, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Ward No. 5, Nainwa, District Bundi, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Primary Education, Department Of Education, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Primary Education, Directorate, Bikaner. 3. The Secretary, Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, State Institute Of Agriculture Management Premises, Shreeji Nagar, Prithviraj Colony, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302018. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harendra Neel, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sandeep Maheshwari, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 10/03/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioners in pursuance to advertisement dated 16.12.2022, applied for the post of Teacher Grade III Level II (SST) under OBC category. It is further submitted that the respondents have not declared the final result qua all the post advertised and 75 seats are still lying vacant on which appointments are to be made. [2025:RJ-JP:10660] (2 of 2) [CW-3398/2025] Further, it is submitted that petitioners have secured requisite marks under the respective category. Lastly, it is submitted that cut off in the OBC (Non-Creamy layer) category is specified as 208.8022 marks and in Unreserved (General) category cut-off is specified as 208.9534 marks. Therefore, petitioners chances for selection would increase, if respondents declare the result qua remaining seats/candidates. Considering the foregoing facts and circumstances of the case, this Courts directs petitioners to file detailed representation qua their grievances before the competent authority, and same be considered by the respondent No.3/ competent authority, by way of speaking order, strictly in accordance with law, in light of the dictum encapsulated in judgment passed by this Court in Pawan Meena vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (SBCWP No. 1665/2024) and Circular issued by the Chief Secretary for the State of Rajasthan, dated 19.02.2024 (No. i- 10¼1½ izlq-@vuqq-&1@2012). Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of with the aforementioned direction. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /144