IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68724 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-23 Year-2025 Thana- Cyber P.S. District- Nawada ====================================================== Rajiv Kumar @ Budhan S/O Late Munni Mahto @ Munni Prasad R/O Vill.- Jalalpur, P.S.- Warisaliganj, Distt.- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Y.C. Verma, Sr. Adv Mrs. Priyanka Singh, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Binod Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 2 26-09-2025 1. Heard Senior Counsel Y.C. Verma for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Nawada Cyber P.S. Case no. 23 of 2025 registered under Sections 303(2) [379 IPC], 318(2), 318(4) [420 IPC], 338 [467 IPC], 319(2) [419 IPC], 336(2), 336(3) [468 IPC], 340(2) [471 IPC], 111 and Section 61(2) [120B IPC] of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita. 3. The allegation in the first information is that the informant, who happens to be the father of the petitioner, lodged a written report before the Cyber Cell stating that his son is committing some fraud in getting dealership to petrol pumps. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the entire first information report, but for the fact that a vague Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68724 of 2025(2) dt.26-09-2025 2/3 allegation has been made against the petitioner by his own father, no substantive material has been shown to connect the petitioner to any crime, much less a cyber offence, and all the passbooks and cheque books whatsoever that have been recovered, stands in the name of the petitioner himself. The said recovery made from the house of the petitioner behind his back does not indicate any such material which shows some serious connection with any cyber fraud. The bail rejection order of the petitioner also does not indicate any specific material against the petitioner but for some vague allegations and the existence of one criminal antecedent in which he is on bail. The petitioner undertakes to cooperate in the case/trial. 5. The application for anticipatory bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State. 6. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and also considering that neither the first information report nor the bail rejection order has shown any substantive material against the petitioner to show his involvement in any cyber fraud but for some vague allegations, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68724 of 2025(2) dt.26-09-2025 3/3 Nawada Cyber P.S. Case no. 23 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Nawada, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure/Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S, 2023 and subject to the following conditions. (a) One of the bailors shall be family member/close relative. (b) The petitioner would fully co-operate with the investing agency, and in case of his non-cooperation, they would have the liberty to move for the cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioner. krishnakant/- (Soni Shrivastava, J) U T