Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 100664 (PNJ)

PANKAJ CHAUHAN v. ARNAV CHAUHAN

CRR(F)/1362/2022 · 2025-05-16

Namit Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Pankaj Chauhan Arnav Chauhan CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Present: - NAMIT KUMAR, J. 1. order dated 10.08.2022, passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Panchkula, vide which petitioner has been directed to pay an amount of Rs.15,000/ maintenance from the date of filing of the petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. till its final disposal. 2. revision petition has been rendered infruc Section 125 Cr.P.C. has been disposed of. 3. 4. 16.05.2025 R.S. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR(F)-1362 Date of decision Pankaj Chauhan Versus Arnav Chauhan HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Mr. Vaibhav Narang, Advocate, Ms. Jasleen Kaur Chhibber, Advocate, for respondent. NAMIT KUMAR, J. (ORAL) Instant revision petition has been filed impugning the order dated 10.08.2022, passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Panchkula, vide which petitioner has been directed to pay an amount of Rs.15,000/- per month to the respondent as interim maintenance from the date of filing of the petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. till its final disposal. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant revision petition has been rendered infruc Section 125 Cr.P.C. has been disposed of. Disposed of as having become infructuous. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1362 of 2022 (O&M) Date of decision: 16.05.2025 ......Petitioner ......Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR . Vaibhav Narang, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Jasleen Kaur Chhibber, Advocate, for respondent. Instant revision petition has been filed impugning the order dated 10.08.2022, passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Panchkula, vide which petitioner has been directed to pay an per month to the respondent as interim maintenance from the date of filing of the petition under Section 125 itioner submits that the instant revision petition has been rendered infructuous as petition under Disposed of as having become infructuous. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (NAMIT KUMAR) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No RAVINDER SINGH 2025.05.16 17:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document