VINOD KUMAR TRIPATHI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/33773/2025 · 2025-09-23
Anish Kumar Gupta, Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 100652 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 100652 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33773 of 2025 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J.
HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Ambrish Shukla, learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for State respondents. Shri Dhananjay Awasthi has accepted notice on behalf of Gorakhpur Industrial Development Authority (in short "Authority").
2. The instant writ petition has been preferred for a direction to respondent no.3-Chief Executive Officer of the Authority to consider the claim of the petitioner in issuing no objection certificate with regard to residential plot no.C-130, Sector-23 and for a further direction to respondent no.3 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 31.05.2025 within stipulated period.
3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on merits of the issue, the writ petition stands disposed of asking the authority concerned to decide the aforesaid representation dated 31.05.2025 in accordance with law expeditiously. September 24, 2025 SP/ Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anand Prakash Yadav, Krishna Nand Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dhananjay Awasthi (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Vinod Kumar Tripathi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SURYA PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad