Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:7801-DB HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. G. NARENDAR AND THE HON’BLE JUSTICE MR. SUBHASH UPADHYAY
Special Appeal No.206 of 2025 3rd September, 2025
Jai Krishan Arya
…Appellant Versus
Mukesh Kumar and Others
…Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------ Presence:- None present for the appellant. Mr. Shiv Pandey, learned counsel for respondent no.1 Mr. Yogesh Chandra Tiwari, learned Standing Counsel for the State/respondent no.2 Mr. Siddhartha Jain, learned counsel for respondent no.3 ------------------------------------------------------------------
JUDGMENT : (Per Sri G. NARENDAR, C.J.)
1.
The case is called out. There is no representation on behalf of the appellant.
2.
Learned counsel for the respondent no.3 bank submits that the appeal has rendered infructuous in view of the fact that the appellant has moved an application before the Debt Recovery Tribunal itself.
3.
In view of the non-appearance of the appellant, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(G. NARENDAR, C.J.)
(SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J.) Dated: 03.09.2025 R/SS 1 SUKHBANT SINGH Digitally signed by SUKHBANT SINGH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=71978f9c61bfde0ba69967c787b1764ea7bc7dd129a8a638 0d49b1885e628615, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=2D8B71B8D8E345F6B7F95B1DD4FB4BEBD2B7D72C 42261361AED33172F152148D, cn=SUKHBANT SINGH Date: 2025.09.10 17:12:31 +05'30'