Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10065 (AP)

MITTAPALLE PARVATHAMMA v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/5601/2025 · 2025-03-06

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 5601 OF 2025 Between: Mittapalle Parvathamma, W/o Mittapalle Reddeppa Reddy, aged about 45 years, Hindu, cultivation. Residing at House bearing D.No. 2-250-C- 2, Ramireddy Layout, Neerugattuvaripalle, H/o Bandameeda kammapalle, Madanapalle Town and Post, Madanapalle Mandal, erst while Chittoor District, now Annamayya District. Presently residing at D.N0.7/98A, Kadapa road, Angallu Kaspa, Angallu Revenue village, Kurabalakota Mandal, Annamayya District. ...Petitioner AND The State of AP, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Amaravathi, Guntur District. The Superintendent of Police, Annamayya District. The Circle Inspector of Police (rural), Madanapalle, Annamayya District. The Station House Officer, Mudivedu P.S, Annamayya District. The Tahsildar, Mudivedu Mandal, Annamayya District. Moolinti Srinivasulu Reddy, S/a M.Ekasi Reddy, aged about 52 years. Residing at Molakavaripalle, H/o Angallu, Kurabalakota Mandal, erstwhile. Chittoor District, now Annamayya District. Moolinti Geethamma, W/o Moolinti Srinivasulu Reddy, aged about 45 years. Residing at Molakavaripalle, H/o Angallu, Kurabalakota Mandal, erstwhile. Chittoor District, now Annamayya District. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Moolinti Rajesh, S/o Moolinti Srinivasulu Reddy, aged about 30 years, Residing at Molakavaripalle, H/o Angallu, Kurabalakota Mandal, erstwhile Chittoor District, now Annamayya District. 9.' Moolinti Harish, S/o Moolinti Srinivasulu Reddy, aged about 27 years. Residing at Molakavaripalle, H/o Angallu, Kurabalakota Mandal, erstwhile Chittoor District, now Annamayya District. Pulaginti Reddeppa, S/o P.Gopal, aged about 64 years. Residing at Thummachetlapalle, H/o Angallu, Kurabalakota Mandal, erstwhile Chittoor District now Annamayya District. Pulaginti Radhamma, W/o Pulaginti Reddeppa, aged about 60 years, Residing at Thummachetlapalle, H/o Angallu, Kurabalakota Mandal, erstwhile- Chittoor District, now Annamayya District. Pulaginti Sujatha, D/o Pulaginti Reddeppa, aged about 35 years. Residing at Thummachetlapalle, H/o Angallu, Kurabalakota Mandal, erstwhile- Chittoor District, now Annamayya District. Pulaginti Srinivasulu, S/o P.Gopal, aged about 60 years. Residing at Thummachetlapalle, H/o Angallu, Kurabalakota Mandal, erstwhile Chittoor District, now Annamayya District. 10. 11. 12. 13. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or Order or direction more particularly on in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 3 to 5 involving in a civil dispute in nature relating to the petitioner property situated in S.No. 235 an extent of Ac.0.67 Cents and S.No. 236 an extent of Ac.0-70 Cents owned and possessed schedule properties vide viz. Annamayya District, Kurabalakota Mandal, Angallu Village, mutated under Khata No. 1365 relating to the petitioner herein, by not to interfere with threat of dispossession or any sort of involvement by any of the respondents 3 to 5 at the instigation of respondents 6 and 13, and without having any power or authority or any jurisdiction and threatening to vacate the possession is questioned as the same is arbitrary, illegal, contrary to the 4 ^ well- established legal principles apart from being violative of fundamental and constitutional rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300- A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents 3 to 5 at the instigation of respondents 6 and 13. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to not to meddle in any manner by the Respondents 3 to 5 at the instigation of respondents 6 & 13 relating to the petitioners’ owned and possessed schedule property situated in S.No. 235 an extent of Ac.0.67 Cents and S.No. 236 an extent of Ac.0-70 Cents owned and possessed schedule properties vide viz. Annamayya District, Kurabalakota Mandal, Angallu Village, mutated under Khata No. 1365 relating to the petitioner by not to interfere with threat of dispossession or any sort of herein involvement by any of the respondents 3 to 5 at the instigation of respondents 6 & 13. pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. P VASU SEKHAR Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.5: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 6 to 13:- The Court made the following order: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 5601/2025 APHC010113302025 [3457] Between: Mittapalle Parvathamma ...PETITIONER AND ...RESPONDENT{S) The State Of Ap and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.P VASU SEKHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME 2.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 5601/2025 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent Nos.3 to 5 are involving in a civil dispute at the behest of the respondent Nos.6 to 13. It is submitted that the petitioner had also filed a civil suit for injunction vide O.S.No.91 of 2023 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Madanapalle and permanent injunction is granted against the respondent Nos.6 to 9 in the said suit. That being so, the respondent Nos.6 to 13 are instigating the respondent Nos.3 to 5 to interfere with the petitioner’s possession and also calling the petitioner to the police station. 2. without any rhyme or any reason. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents submits that the civil disputes are pending between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents. Be that as it may, there shall be a direction to the 4. respondent Nos. 3 & 4 not to disturb the peace of the petitioner without following due process of law. % 3 5. With these observations, the Writ Petition is disposed off. There shall be no costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ^ / Sd/- P.U.V.BHASKAR RAO ASSISTANT. REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// S ON OFFICER To, 1. The Principal Secretary, Home Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat Buildings, Amaravathi, Guntur District. The Superintendent of Police, Annamayya District. The Circle Inspector of Police (rural), Madanapalle, Annamayya District. The Station House Officer, Mudivedu P.S, Annamayya District. The Tahsildar, Mudivedu Mandal, Annamayya District. One CC to Sri. P Vasu Sekhar Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] Three CD Copies 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. GSC HIGH COURT DATED:06/03/2025 ORDER WP.No.5601 of 2025 ^ 0 7 MAR 2025 ^ . Current Section . ^ ^^.?gSPATr.HCO<»y DISPOSING OF THE WP WITHOUT COSTS