Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10064 (RAJ)

SHAHID @ LALA SON OF SHRI DEENU v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/3367/2025 · 2025-03-20

Praveer Bhatnagar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:12620] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3367/2025 Shahid @ Lala Son Of Shri Deenu, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Olanda Police Station Kaithwada, District Deeg. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Bharatpur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 20/03/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.172/2024, registered at Police Station Kaithwada, District Deeg, for the offence(s) under Sections 111(2)(a), 303(2), 317(2), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 308(2) and 61(2)(a) of B.N.S. and Sections 66-D and 66- E of I.T. Act. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case, solely on the basis of disclosure statement of the co-accused. The accused- petitioner is in custody since long and the trial of the case may take considerable time. The offences alleged to have been committed by the accused-petitioner are exclusively triable by Magistrate, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. [2025:RJ-JP:12620] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3367/2025] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the grant of bail application. 4. Heard and perused the material available on the record. 5. It is not desirable to express anything on the merits of the case, the accused-petitioner is in custody since long and trial of the case may take considerable time. The offences alleged to have been committed by the accused-petitioner are exclusively triable by Magistrate, therefore, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner- Shahid @ Lala Son Of Shri Deenu, in connection with FIR No.172/2024, registered at Police Station Kaithwada, District Deeg, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The accused-petitioner is also directed to mark his presence on 25th of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned Police Station. The SHO of the concerned Police Station shall send the presence report of the accused-petitioner to the trial Court, every month. In case of any breach to the above condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-11