Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33706 of 2025 Court No. - 21 HON'BLE MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, J.
HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Rajiv Gupta, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for respondent no.1 and Ms. Shruti Taneja, Advocate holding brief of Shri Kartikeya Saran, learned counsel for respondents no.2 and 3.
2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the payment against final bill submitted by the petitioner after due performance of the contract is not being made. The petitioner has lastly represented on 09.06.2025 and when still payment has not been made, the present writ petition has been filed.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for a direction to respondent no.3 to decide the representation dated 09.06.2025.
4. Learned counsel for the respondents do not oppose the prayer for deciding the representation.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no.3 to decide the representation dated 09.06.2025 by speaking order within six weeks from the date of communication of the instant order along with photostat copy of the representation and supporting evidence. September 24, 2025 Ankit. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Deepak Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Arun Kumar,J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.) Lakhan Lal Nishad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANKIT VISHWAKARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad