HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 7836 of 2025 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and Sri V.P.Tripathi, learned AGA for the State and perused the material on record. 2. This application under Section 482 BNSS has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 374 of 2024, under Sections 137(2), 87, 61(2) BNS, Police Station Jani, District Meerut. 3. Counsel for the applicant contends that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. As per the statement of the victim, the role of abduction and kidnapping has been assigned to co-accused Shuaib. Co- accused Shuaib has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 23.06.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 20700 of 2025. At this stage there is no credible evidence to link the applicant with the offence. Investigation has been completed. Charge sheet has been submitted. The applicant had co-operated in the investigation. The applicant has been summoned by the concerned court. No custodial interrogation is required. The applicant is a lady and has no criminal antecedents. The applicant has apprehension of her arrest in the above mentioned case. In case, the applicant is granted anticipatory bail till conclusion of trial, she will not misuse the said liberty. 4. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail but could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record. 5. Having regard to the submissions made, considering the nature of Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Kushagra Srivastava, Shahrukh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ishrat .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) accusations and antecedents of the applicant, in particular the fact, that as per the statement of the victim, the role of abduction and kidnapping has been assigned to co-accused Shuaib, who has been granted bail by this Court; at this stage, there is no substantive evidence to link the applicant with the offence; charge sheet has been submitted, the applicant had co-operated in the investigation, no custodial interrogation is required, without commenting on merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled for anticipatory bail. 6. In the event of arrest, the applicant Ishrat, involved in the aforesaid case crime be released on anticipatory bail during pendency of trial, on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall make herself available on each date fixed in the matter by the court concerned; (ii) the applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade from disclosing such facts to the Court; (iii) the applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if she has passport the same shall be deposited by her before the concerned court. 7. In default of any of the conditions, the court concerned is at liberty to pass appropriate orders for enforcing and compelling the same. 8. The application stands disposed of. September 25, 2025 Lbm/- NABAIL No. 7836 of 2025 2 (Vivek Varma,J.) Digitally signed by :- LAL BAHADUR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad