Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10058 (JHR)

VANSH RAJ RAY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./2500/2025 · 2025-07-08

Sri Ananda Sen

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:18326 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.2500 of 2025 ------ Vansh Raj Ray, S/o Umesh Prasad Yadav. … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. … … Opposite Party ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Srivastava, A.P.P. ----- 05/ 08.07.2025 Heard the parties. 2. This anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, has been preferred by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Tinpahar P.S. Case No.54 of 2022, for offences under Sections 406 and 408 IPC. The case is presently pending before the Court of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Rajmahal. 3. Learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that his case is squarely covered by the directions and guidelines issued from time to time by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Another, reported in (2022) 10 SCC 51, Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Another, reported in (2024) 9 SCC 198. Thus, he wants to withdraw this application to appear before the concerned Cognizance taking Court, since charge-sheet has already been submitted. 4. In view of the aforesaid submission, permission is granted to withdraw this application. 5. Accordingly, this Anticipatory Bail Application stands disposed of as withdrawn. (ANANDA SEN, J.) Prashant. Cp-3